PDA

View Full Version : followup: California outlaws large, power-hungry TVs


RACER X
11-24-2009, 12:30 PM
California outlaws large, power-hungry TVs

In a move that could spell the end of the plasma TV industry as we know it, the state of California agreed today to enact strict regulations on the amount of power televisions can consume, effectively outlawing most large plasma TVs as of January 1, 2011, with many more televisions set to be banned beginning January 1, 2013.

The state had been concerned that 10 percent of a home's energy use is typically devoted to the TV and its related equipment, and that percentage has been increasing as consumers gain access to larger and larger (and cheaper and cheaper) televisions, which command an ever-increasing hunger for power.

The new rules go into effect a little more than a year from now: On January 1, 2011, televisions will be required to reduce energy consumption by an average of 33 percent. In 2013, a second tier of restrictions will go into effect, with average energy consumption required to be reduced by 49 percent vs. today's levels.

Rest assured, this doesn't mean the end of the television as we know it. As the California Energy Commission notes, as of now, over 1,000 televisions already meet the 2011 standards, so many manufacturers won't have to panic in order to comply with the regulations, at least for now.

Those who will be heavily affected are manufacturers who make televisions that draw more than their fair share of juice. A formula related to the size of the TV's screen in square inches will be used to determine the maximum power draw allowed by a TV. For example, Panasonic's 54-inch VIERA plasma TV would be allowed to draw 281 watts of power in "on mode." Today that set is rated to draw 293 watts of power. Smaller plasmas are generally OK under the 2011 specs, but virtually all of them fall short when put up against the 2013 rules. That same 54-inch plasma will be required to draw only 175 watts once 2013 arrives, a power reduction that just might not be possible.

Bottom line: Most LCD televisions will be safe under the 2011 law, and many plasmas will as well, but come 2013, everyone's going to have to do some serious belt-tightening.

All told, the new rules are expected to save 6,515 Gigawatt-hours annually in the state, save the state $8.7 billion in costs for additional power plants, and save consumers $8.1 billion a year in lower energy bills.

One additional point of note: The new rules currently don't apply to very large TVs, those of 1,400 square inches or larger (roughly a 58" set), although rules are likely to be enacted against these ultra-large sets in the second phase of this legislation.

http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/null/154936

z06boy
11-24-2009, 01:05 PM
I really liked California when I visited earlier this year BUT am so glad I don't live there...too many extra rules/laws.

If they start that here...glad I've only got a 46" LCD...although I wanted bigger when I bought this one. :lol:

Smittie61984
11-24-2009, 05:51 PM
They vote nut jobs like Pelosi, Governator, etc in office so here is what you get. I don't see why they just turn over control of the state to the UC Berkely students and get it over with. That's the direction they are heading so why not put it on the fast track.

Dave
11-24-2009, 06:19 PM
when the hell are businesses going to cut california off? a nice products embargo would fix a lot of the bullshit that place produces

Papa_Complex
11-25-2009, 08:59 AM
when the hell are businesses going to cut california off? a nice products embargo would fix a lot of the bullshit that place produces

Hard to cut off a State that has a larger population than my entire country. That's a big market.

derf
11-25-2009, 09:32 AM
And in other news the TV emporium chain of discount superstores has announced it will open a series of stores in Nevada along its border with California

Dave
11-25-2009, 11:39 AM
Hard to cut off a State that has a larger population than my entire country. That's a big market.

never said it wasnt gonna hurt but someones needed to reign them in since they came up with their one state emissions for cars in the 70s.

And in other news the TV emporium chain of discount superstores has announced it will open a series of stores in Nevada along its border with California

exactly. And if we end up bailing their worthless asses out they should lose their rights to vote and representation until such time as they pay it back.

fasternyou929
11-25-2009, 11:43 AM
Manufacturers will just find ways to make their sets more efficient. Of course, it'll cost more. Did car manufacturers stop selling in CA when all the emissions requirements went into effect?

This will be the same. And, as much as I dislike big gov't, the silver lining is it will push vendors to make more energy efficient devices.

Papa_Complex
11-25-2009, 12:04 PM
Manufacturers will just find ways to make their sets more efficient. Of course, it'll cost more. Did car manufacturers stop selling in CA when all the emissions requirements went into effect?

This will be the same. And, as much as I dislike big gov't, the silver lining is it will push vendors to make more energy efficient devices.

I'm not all that worried, given that 80%+ are supposed to already be in compliance.

Apoc
11-25-2009, 02:02 PM
wow... whats next?

While it doesnt affect me in anyway, its disturbing that any governement can make laws like this to cover their own failings.

Papa_Complex
11-25-2009, 02:04 PM
wow... whats next?

While it doesnt affect me in anyway, its disturbing that any governement can make laws like this to cover their own failings.

What, don't they all?

Apoc
11-25-2009, 02:14 PM
yes, but not in banning tv's. Whats next? No electric shavers (even though I hate them anyway), because it takes less power than a razor?

Usually they make laws to divert attention from themselves. this is a little different.

fasternyou929
11-25-2009, 03:30 PM
yes, but not in banning tv's. Whats next? No electric shavers (even though I hate them anyway), because it takes less power than a razor?

Usually they make laws to divert attention from themselves. this is a little different.

This is no different. California has had some awful energy crises in the recent past. If only it weren't for those damn flat screen TV's.... :lol:

Papa_Complex
11-25-2009, 03:33 PM
This is no different. California has had some awful energy crises in the recent past. If only it weren't for those damn flat screen TV's.... :lol:

All to distract from the fact that they screwed up by deregulating the electricity supply ;)

Homeslice
11-25-2009, 05:33 PM
One additional point of note: The new rules currently don't apply to very large TVs, those of 1,400 square inches or larger (roughly a 58" set), although rules are likely to be enacted against these ultra-large sets in the second phase of this legislation.

:confused: makes no sense

101lifts2
11-26-2009, 03:41 AM
The problem isn't TVs..the problem is overpopulation caused by guess who? Mexicans. I mean why do you have to have 6 kids each? Condoms anyone?

I would love to see them outlaw movie theaters...Hollyweird would go nutz. lol

Papa_Complex
11-26-2009, 07:21 AM
yes, but not in banning tv's. Whats next? No electric shavers (even though I hate them anyway), because it takes less power than a razor?

Usually they make laws to divert attention from themselves. this is a little different.

What's next, is banning people under the age of 25 from riding sportbikes (Quebec).

Antwanny
12-01-2009, 11:16 PM
when the hell are businesses going to cut california off? a nice products embargo would fix a lot of the bullshit that place produces

maybe it will set this crazy place straight.