Its not about choice, its about privacy.
That and federal regulation of the female reproductive system. |
Quote:
Yes, that would make perfect sense. They call that "abstinence" and it is supported by much the same people who support measures like the one outlined in the story. It also works quite well, at least when people actually are abstinent, which it seems is not as often as its proponents would like. In fact it seems to be even less the case in their own back yards. < offofftopic > |
Quote:
Quote:
I am pro-choice (or as I call it, pro-death) but I don't believe that choice should be made lightly or used as an alternative to responsibility. It's not a bad thing for a young woman to understand the choice she's making and that it isn't just a reset button. However, I don't like the idea of re-traumatizing a rape or incest victim either. Unless they require a patient to disclose if it is a rape or incest case, I guess there's no way to differentiate and therefore they either have to subject everyone or no one. :idk: |
I'm not just pro-choice, I'm pro-abortion. I think every woman who thinks about having an abortion while pregnant should go get one immediately.
Fewer people in the world FTW. |
Pro-choice here too. The only limits I agree with as far as choosing is how far along in the pregnancy it should be allowed.
|
Quote:
Really? That is certainly an interesting view point...one not based in reality...but interesting. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm walking away from this thread... |
Quote:
|
Who gives a flying fuck why the woman got pregnant, whether it was her fault or not? It does not benefit society to have unwanted babies that will in turn produce more unwanted babies.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.