Two Wheel Fix

Two Wheel Fix (http://www.twowheelfix.com/index.php)
-   News Desk (http://www.twowheelfix.com/forumdisplay.php?f=97)
-   -   High Fructose Corn Syrup Causes More Weight Gain Than Sugar (http://www.twowheelfix.com/showthread.php?t=13906)

EpyonXero 03-24-2010 09:32 AM

High Fructose Corn Syrup Causes More Weight Gain Than Sugar
 
http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/a.../S26/91/22K07/

Quote:

A Princeton University research team has demonstrated that all sweeteners are not equal when it comes to weight gain: Rats with access to high-fructose corn syrup gained significantly more weight than those with access to table sugar, even when their overall caloric intake was the same.

In addition to causing significant weight gain in lab animals, long-term consumption of high-fructose corn syrup also led to abnormal increases in body fat, especially in the abdomen, and a rise in circulating blood fats called triglycerides. The researchers say the work sheds light on the factors contributing to obesity trends in the United States.

"Some people have claimed that high-fructose corn syrup is no different than other sweeteners when it comes to weight gain and obesity, but our results make it clear that this just isn't true, at least under the conditions of our tests," said psychology professor Bart Hoebel, who specializes in the neuroscience of appetite, weight and sugar addiction. "When rats are drinking high-fructose corn syrup at levels well below those in soda pop, they're becoming obese -- every single one, across the board. Even when rats are fed a high-fat diet, you don't see this; they don't all gain extra weight."


In results published online March 18 by the journal Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, the researchers from the Department of Psychology and the Princeton Neuroscience Institute reported on two experiments investigating the link between the consumption of high-fructose corn syrup and obesity.

The first study showed that male rats given water sweetened with high-fructose corn syrup in addition to a standard diet of rat chow gained much more weight than male rats that received water sweetened with table sugar, or sucrose, in conjunction with the standard diet. The concentration of sugar in the sucrose solution was the same as is found in some commercial soft drinks, while the high-fructose corn syrup solution was half as concentrated as most sodas.

The second experiment -- the first long-term study of the effects of high-fructose corn syrup consumption on obesity in lab animals -- monitored weight gain, body fat and triglyceride levels in rats with access to high-fructose corn syrup over a period of six months. Compared to animals eating only rat chow, rats on a diet rich in high-fructose corn syrup showed characteristic signs of a dangerous condition known in humans as the metabolic syndrome, including abnormal weight gain, significant increases in circulating triglycerides and augmented fat deposition, especially visceral fat around the belly. Male rats in particular ballooned in size: Animals with access to high-fructose corn syrup gained 48 percent more weight than those eating a normal diet. In humans, this would be equivalent to a 200-pound man gaining 96 pounds.

"These rats aren't just getting fat; they're demonstrating characteristics of obesity, including substantial increases in abdominal fat and circulating triglycerides," said Princeton graduate student Miriam Bocarsly. "In humans, these same characteristics are known risk factors for high blood pressure, coronary artery disease, cancer and diabetes." In addition to Hoebel and Bocarsly, the research team included Princeton undergraduate Elyse Powell and visiting research associate Nicole Avena, who was affiliated with Rockefeller University during the study and is now on the faculty at the University of Florida. The Princeton researchers note that they do not know yet why high-fructose corn syrup fed to rats in their study generated more triglycerides, and more body fat that resulted in obesity.


When male rats were given water sweetened with high-fructose corn syrup in addition to a standard diet of rat chow, the animals gained much more weight than male rats that received water sweetened with table sugar, or sucrose, along with the standard diet. The concentration of sugar in the sucrose solution was the same as is found in some commercial soft drinks, while the high-fructose corn syrup solution was half as concentrated as most sodas, including the orange soft drink shown here. (Photo: Denise Applewhite)
High-fructose corn syrup and sucrose are both compounds that contain the simple sugars fructose and glucose, but there at least two clear differences between them. First, sucrose is composed of equal amounts of the two simple sugars -- it is 50 percent fructose and 50 percent glucose -- but the typical high-fructose corn syrup used in this study features a slightly imbalanced ratio, containing 55 percent fructose and 42 percent glucose. Larger sugar molecules called higher saccharides make up the remaining 3 percent of the sweetener. Second, as a result of the manufacturing process for high-fructose corn syrup, the fructose molecules in the sweetener are free and unbound, ready for absorption and utilization. In contrast, every fructose molecule in sucrose that comes from cane sugar or beet sugar is bound to a corresponding glucose molecule and must go through an extra metabolic step before it can be utilized.

This creates a fascinating puzzle. The rats in the Princeton study became obese by drinking high-fructose corn syrup, but not by drinking sucrose. The critical differences in appetite, metabolism and gene expression that underlie this phenomenon are yet to be discovered, but may relate to the fact that excess fructose is being metabolized to produce fat, while glucose is largely being processed for energy or stored as a carbohydrate, called glycogen, in the liver and muscles.

In the 40 years since the introduction of high-fructose corn syrup as a cost-effective sweetener in the American diet, rates of obesity in the U.S. have skyrocketed, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 1970, around 15 percent of the U.S. population met the definition for obesity; today, roughly one-third of the American adults are considered obese, the CDC reported. High-fructose corn syrup is found in a wide range of foods and beverages, including fruit juice, soda, cereal, bread, yogurt, ketchup and mayonnaise. On average, Americans consume 60 pounds of the sweetener per person every year.

"Our findings lend support to the theory that the excessive consumption of high-fructose corn syrup found in many beverages may be an important factor in the obesity epidemic," Avena said.

The new research complements previous work led by Hoebel and Avena demonstrating that sucrose can be addictive, having effects on the brain similar to some drugs of abuse.

In the future, the team intends to explore how the animals respond to the consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in conjunction with a high-fat diet -- the equivalent of a typical fast-food meal containing a hamburger, fries and soda -- and whether excessive high-fructose corn syrup consumption contributes to the diseases associated with obesity. Another step will be to study how fructose affects brain function in the control of appetite.

The research was supported by the U.S. Public Health Service.


Particle Man 03-24-2010 09:41 AM

um, duh. that's because they put that shit in EVERYTHING these days.

AquaPython 03-24-2010 10:43 AM

just more facts. that shit needs to be outlawed

Switch 03-24-2010 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AquaPython (Post 352846)
just more facts. that shit needs to be outlawed

Yeah right, that would be like the government going against itself. There are lots of incentives for doing all this crap with corn. There would be a lot of people out of business if they outlawed this.

The government is not responsible for making rules and laws to protect you from yourself. You have the information, you can control what goes in your body. If you think it's a serious health risk, then don't consume it. Pretty simple.

Particle Man 03-24-2010 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AquaPython (Post 352846)
just more facts. that shit needs to be outlawed

food companies finding cheap (and pretty much almost always) unhealthy alternatives to ingredients needs to be outlawed.

Kaneman 03-24-2010 11:08 AM

IMO, corn is a bigger source of health problems in America than Tobacco. Corn subsidies are out of control and like Prtcl said, EVERYTHING has fucking corn in it...even the meat you eat (unless you buy from a small farm or something).

Colbert actually did a bit about this the other day, showed some cat litter that is now made from 100% corn. "In America we have so much food we let our pets shit on it."

Check out "Food Inc." They have it on Netflix streaming, if you didn't already know where you food comes from you're not going to like what you see.

AquaPython 03-24-2010 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tennessee Stud (Post 352850)
Yeah right, that would be like the government going against itself. There are lots of incentives for doing all this crap with corn. There would be a lot of people out of business if they outlawed this.

The government is not responsible for making rules and laws to protect you from yourself. You have the information, you can control what goes in your body. If you think it's a serious health risk, then don't consume it. Pretty simple.

well aware. take a look at King Corn, and Food, Inc. both amazing documentaries on the subject. The incentives, basically comprising of 60% of a farmer's (who grows corn) income was put in place with a historical food bill in the early 70's. It's all been put in place and continued to be protected by gov't officials , and lobbyists that were in execs in the industry. it's a giant stroke fest, and they are literally killing the country in the process of making a dishonest buck.
This is why the food bill needs to re-worked, and most of the bullshit needs to be brought to light and outlawed. I think in the same vein, Anybody at an official level in the gov't should have total financial transparency , so anyone can check and see if they are making profits where they should not be. too much goddam corruption.

Kaneman 03-24-2010 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tennessee Stud (Post 352850)
The government is not responsible for making rules and laws to protect you from yourself. You have the information, you can control what goes in your body. If you think it's a serious health risk, then don't consume it. Pretty simple.

That's a nice sentiment, but it doesn't work that way in the real world. My wife and I have been trying, very diligently, to avoid processed foods and those made with corn. Even with me not working and having the time during the day to research and shop for healthy groceries, its nearly an impossible task. It would certainly be impossible (at least here in DFW) for a family where both parents work full-time.

See, its the government themselves that are responsible for this current predicament due to their agricultural policy. I agree that people need to be responsible for their own intake, and know where their food comes from....but unless you own and operate a working farm/ranch then you're shit out of luck.

Kaneman 03-24-2010 11:13 AM

That's two recommendations for Food Inc. Watch it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eKYyD14d_0

Switch 03-24-2010 11:21 AM

I've seen Food Inc. a couple of times. It's a good doc.

AquaPython 03-24-2010 11:23 AM

you guys see King Corn? it is more about the food bill and corn industry from start to finsh. Food inc is a bit broader and covers a bunch of other subjects within the food industry that also needs to be addressed.

Rider 03-24-2010 11:24 AM

HFCS is bad for you, very bad. As a mater for fact I avoid corn in any form. Corn serves no purpose but to fatten cows and hogs and provide renewable fuel.

AquaPython 03-24-2010 11:27 AM

renewable fuel?? are you talking about ethanol? ethanol is a net negative energy. it costs more fuel to grow and process than it produces.

Kaneman 03-24-2010 11:27 AM

I haven't seen King Corn...I'll try to find it though.

Does anything else think its ironic that corn is the one food you eat and shit out whole.....yet we put it in EVERYTHING?

But you know, the truth of it is, is you're poor or struggling to feed a family....you won't be able to afford healthy foods. But you can damn sure hit up that dollar menu.

tommymac 03-24-2010 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rider (Post 352899)
HFCS is bad for you, very bad. As a mater for fact I avoid corn in any form. Corn serves no purpose but to fatten cows and hogs and provide renewable fuel.

helps clean the ole pipes too LOL

I actualy like corn so I guess i am part of the evil empire :lol:

Kaneman 03-24-2010 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tommymac (Post 352904)
helps clean the ole pipes too LOL

I actualy like corn so I guess i am part of the evil empire :lol:

Dude, nothing wrong with some good ol' grilled corn on the cob. But when everything you consume contains corn that it becomes a problem.

AquaPython 03-24-2010 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaneman (Post 352903)

But you know, the truth of it is, is you're poor or struggling to feed a family....you won't be able to afford healthy foods. But you can damn sure hit up that dollar menu.

thats the point of it all, how is it possible that 1$ hamburger exists? greed.

Kaneman 03-24-2010 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AquaPython (Post 352907)
thats the point of it all, how is it possible that 1$ hamburger exists? greed.

Leaving the dollar menu behind was the hardest thing I've ever done. Harder than quitting tobacco (so far) and harder the quitting Walmart.

tommymac 03-24-2010 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaneman (Post 352909)
Leaving the dollar menu behind was the hardest thing I've ever done. Harder than quitting tobacco (so far) and harder the quitting Walmart.

Its the convienience of fast food thats the killer. Since I have moved I have cut down on eating FF since there realy arent any places right by my house. But going home from the hospital I pass at least 5 mcdonalds restaurants that are hardly out of the way of my ride home.

AquaPython 03-24-2010 11:37 AM

i stopped eating that bullshit in college so it was not hard for me. In fact, i never even loved it as a kid. But there are some chemicals in that crap that make it addicting , just like a drug, when you eat enough of it. When you get off of it long enough, and you pass one with a window down, the stench of it makes you sick.

ever see Super- Size Me ? the guy goes on a nothing-but-McDonalds binge for 1 month around the country. he nearly died.

Adeptus_Minor 03-24-2010 11:40 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rider (Post 352899)
HFCS is bad for you, very bad. As a mater for fact I avoid corn in any form. Corn serves no purpose but to fatten cows and hogs and provide renewable fuel.

I happen to like corn cob pipes (aka Missouri Meerschaum) and let us not forget corn for whiskey :D
(or was that part of the 'renewable fuel' thing?)

oh, and just because I'm feeling sweet...

Rider 03-24-2010 12:08 PM

It's not just corn though. Flour and potatoes are bad for you as well. Meat, fruit, and vegetables are all we need to maintain proper health.

Homeslice 03-24-2010 12:41 PM

Funny, how I get laughed at for talking about ingrediants and healthy eating, and then I come to this thread where people are making more extreme diet recommendations than I ever have :lol:

BTW, potatoes are not "bad" for you unless you're a sedentary person who never exercises, in which case they can lead to weight gain because they're fast-burning carbs. Sweet potatoes on the other hand, don't burn nearly as fast, and are actually quite good for you.

Adeptus_Minor 03-24-2010 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homeslice (Post 352943)
Sweet potatoes on the other hand, don't burn nearly as fast, and are actually quite good for you.

Sweet potato fries rock.

Cass 03-24-2010 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaneman (Post 352903)
But you know, the truth of it is, is you're poor or struggling to feed a family....you won't be able to afford healthy foods. But you can damn sure hit up that dollar menu.

This is exactly the problem.... it's more costly to eat healthy, yet it would save money in the long run (less sick time used away from work, less dr visits, less health problems). Yes... those are broad generalizations, but aren't those the same generalizations that are being made in the push to get away from the overprocessed foods?

Cass 03-24-2010 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adeptus_Minor (Post 352963)
Sweet potato fries rock.

Much nom has been had on sweet potato fries. Though not at once, mind you. LOL

Homeslice 03-24-2010 02:06 PM

All the money they're planning on spending to get uninsured people insured......How about spending some of that money encouraging those people to eat better? Things like brown rice and black-eyed peas are affordable even to poor people, and they're a lot healthier than most of the crap those people eat. Or how about spending some money improving the shitty food they serve at school cafeterias?

Avatard 03-24-2010 03:54 PM

You fatten livestock with corn.

I have been saying this about HFCS for YEARS, despite industry claims that it has the same ratio of Sucrose to Fructose as Table Sugar, the sudden spike in US obesity having coincided with the widespread soft drink industry shift to HFCS was already a pretty damning bit of evidence for anyone paying fucking attention, but it sure is nice to see the fuckers in lab coats confirm my suspicions.

Adeptus_Minor 03-24-2010 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homeslice (Post 352998)
All the money they're planning on spending to get uninsured people insured......How about spending some of that money encouraging those people to eat better? Things like brown rice and black-eyed peas are affordable even to poor people, and they're a lot healthier than most of the crap those people eat. Or how about spending some money improving the shitty food they serve at school cafeterias?

That's Jamie Oliver's job.

http://www.jamieoliver.com/campaigns...ood-revolution

goof2 03-24-2010 07:58 PM

I like HFCS.:lol:

smileyman 03-24-2010 08:53 PM

This thread is corny.

However, I like sugar colas better than HFCS colas. It is the HFCS that makes me drink my whiskey straight anymore.

Captain Morgan 03-24-2010 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaneman (Post 352903)
But you know, the truth of it is, is you're poor or struggling to feed a family....you won't be able to afford healthy foods. But you can damn sure hit up that dollar menu.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cass (Post 352996)
This is exactly the problem.... it's more costly to eat healthy, yet it would save money in the long run (less sick time used away from work, less dr visits, less health problems). Yes... those are broad generalizations, but aren't those the same generalizations that are being made in the push to get away from the overprocessed foods?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homeslice (Post 352998)
All the money they're planning on spending to get uninsured people insured......How about spending some of that money encouraging those people to eat better? Things like brown rice and black-eyed peas are affordable even to poor people, and they're a lot healthier than most of the crap those people eat. Or how about spending some money improving the shitty food they serve at school cafeterias?

Quoted for truth. Nothing more to add.

101lifts2 03-24-2010 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaneman (Post 352888)
That's a nice sentiment, but it doesn't work that way in the real world. My wife and I have been trying, very diligently, to avoid processed foods and those made with corn. Even with me not working and having the time during the day to research and shop for healthy groceries, its nearly an impossible task. .....

Are you serious? Try this...no high frutcose corn syrup..

Tuna
Eggs
Cottage Cheeze
Rice
Pasta
Fruit
Vegetables
Chicken
Beef

I could go on......The problem is if someone only likes sugary shit, he will that is the only thing available.

If you want something sweet use Dextrose, Maltodextin or Stevia.

101lifts2 03-24-2010 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tennessee Stud (Post 352850)
Yeah right, that would be like the government going against itself. There are lots of incentives for doing all this crap with corn. There would be a lot of people out of business if they outlawed this.

The government is not responsible for making rules and laws to protect you from yourself. You have the information, you can control what goes in your body. If you think it's a serious health risk, then don't consume it. Pretty simple.

Amen brother!

101lifts2 03-24-2010 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homeslice (Post 352943)
Funny, how I get laughed at for talking about ingrediants and healthy eating, and then I come to this thread where people are making more extreme diet recommendations than I ever have :lol:

BTW, potatoes are not "bad" for you unless you're a sedentary person who never exercises, in which case they can lead to weight gain because they're fast-burning carbs. Sweet potatoes on the other hand, don't burn nearly as fast, and are actually quite good for you.

Potatoes are GREAT post workout. BAKED potatoes.

BobTheBiker 03-25-2010 12:17 AM

I thought I liked that throwback pepsi better with actual sugar. you really can tell a difference.

this doesnt surprise me though, isnt HFCS a synthetic sweetener? I've long believed natural shit is 100% healthier than that absolute shit synthetic sweetener.

AquaPython 03-25-2010 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 101lifts2 (Post 353150)
Are you serious? Try this...no high frutcose corn syrup..

Tuna
Eggs
Cottage Cheeze
Rice
Pasta
Fruit
Vegetables
Chicken
Beef

I could go on......The problem is if someone only likes sugary shit, he will that is the only thing available.

If you want something sweet use Dextrose, Maltodextin or Stevia.


Umm NO.

you wish it was that simple . foods that are only "sugary shit". time to wake up.

if you have never left the country, chances are you have NEVER eaten beef that was not raised SOLELY on, you guessed it..... C O R N.

most chicken, easily accessible, fed C O R N

even though this story in the OP is about HFCS - the REAL story is a bit larger. corn is used for EVERYTHING. HFCS is the widest used, nastiest culprit.

take a look at this and tell me if these ingredients look at all familiar to you:

http://www.cornallergens.com/list/co...table-list.php

CrazyKell 03-25-2010 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaneman (Post 352903)
Does anything else think its ironic that corn is the one food you eat and shit out whole.....yet we put it in EVERYTHING?

You don't shit it out whole. It's just the casings of the kernels you're shitting out. The stuff on the inside is absorbed and used by the body. ;)

Why do I know that? :scratch: :lmao:

Kaneman 03-25-2010 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 101lifts2 (Post 353150)
Are you serious? Try this...no high frutcose corn syrup..

Tuna
Eggs
Cottage Cheeze
Rice
Pasta
Fruit
Vegetables
Chicken
Beef

I could go on......The problem is if someone only likes sugary shit, he will that is the only thing available.

If you want something sweet use Dextrose, Maltodextin or Stevia.

:lol: Aquapython already covered this, so yea.

101, dude, I thought you were supposed to be some sort of nutrition expert...you mean to tell me you didn't already know this stuff?

Homeslice 03-25-2010 12:21 PM

So, you guys are going to avoid eating chicken, eggs, and beef, simply because those animals eat a lot of corn? Please.

If so, then go right ahead and eat seafood for breakfast, lunch, and dinner........And die of mercury poisoning instead :lol:

Jesus, and you guys give ME a hard time for whining about cancerous grilling hydrocarbons :lol:

Kaneman 03-25-2010 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homeslice (Post 353295)
So, you guys are going to avoid eating chicken, eggs, and beef, simply because those animals eat a lot of corn? Please.

If so, then go right ahead and eat seafood for breakfast, lunch, and dinner........And die of mercury poisoning instead :lol:

Jesus, and you guys give ME a hard time for whining about cancerous grilling hydrocarbons :lol:

No, I'm not, especially since I developed a shellfish allergy a month ago, :lol:

We're trying to locate sources of meat that are more natural. I do not wish to eat animals that have wallowed around in their own feces and fed shit food until they are nearly dead. I'm fortunate because I grew up on a cattle ranch that is family owned. I can have a cow slaughtered (as soon as I get a deep freezer) that has been entirely grass/hay fed and given no antibiotics or other chemicals at all.

As far as chicken goes I haven't found a solution. The whole chickens at the local mexican meat markets are higher quality than Pilgrim's Pride and of various sizes with normal sized breasts...but i still don't know where they came from.

Homeslice 03-25-2010 12:36 PM

That's cool. Are some brands of meat saying that they are grass-fed on the label?

Kaneman 03-25-2010 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homeslice (Post 353301)
That's cool. Are some brands of meat saying that they are grass-fed on the label?

If they're out there I can't find them. Not even at Central Market. Unless you count the $49.99 per lb Kobe beef they sell, lol. I can, however, buy bison that is raised locally (on Ross Perot's land I believe) and grass/hay fed. Its quite good, and much more lean than a similar cut of beef.

Have you guys ever ridden by an industrial chicken house complex or cattle fed lot? I did in NC and CO....goddamn worst smell I've ever encountered in both cases.

Captain Morgan 03-25-2010 12:43 PM

On the subject of corn or grass-fed beef...is there any regulation about them? If not, then who's to say a farmer doesn't feed corn to his cows or chickens most of the time, but give them grass or hay once or twice in their life. Hell, I can say a cow was grass fed if I fed it grass one time in it's life, then charge more for the meat. So are there regulations to it?

Homeslice 03-25-2010 12:46 PM

Any of you guys ever taken advantage of that Omaha Steaks junk mail? The one where they claim they are the source of top restaurants around the country? Assuming it's not a load of BS, I figure you could get a bunch of their shit delivered and then quit.

AquaPython 03-25-2010 12:56 PM

what kind of beef do you think restaurants use? corn fed beef.

shmike 03-25-2010 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 101lifts2 (Post 353150)
Are you serious? Try this...no high frutcose corn syrup..

Tuna
Eggs
Cottage Cheeze
Rice
Pasta
Fruit
Vegetables
Chicken
Beef

I could go on......The problem is if someone only likes sugary shit, he will that is the only thing available.

If you want something sweet use Dextrose, Maltodextin or Stevia.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AquaPython (Post 353223)
Umm NO.

you wish it was that simple . foods that are only "sugary shit". time to wake up.

if you have never left the country, chances are you have NEVER eaten beef that was not raised SOLELY on, you guessed it..... C O R N.

most chicken, easily accessible, fed C O R N

even though this story in the OP is about HFCS - the REAL story is a bit larger. corn is used for EVERYTHING. HFCS is the widest used, nastiest culprit.

take a look at this and tell me if these ingredients look at all familiar to you:

http://www.cornallergens.com/list/co...table-list.php

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaneman (Post 353268)
:lol: Aquapython already covered this, so yea.

101, dude, I thought you were supposed to be some sort of nutrition expert...you mean to tell me you didn't already know this stuff?


101 said that those ingredients are free from HFCS and he was right.

The corn vs grass feed argument is another debate all together.

Most animals that are fed a corn based diet are also pumped full of steroids, antibiotics, hormones, etc.

By buying organic meat that does not contain pharmaceuticals you stand a better chance of avoiding those that were raised on a corn diet.

goof2 03-25-2010 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homeslice (Post 353307)
Any of you guys ever taken advantage of that Omaha Steaks junk mail? The one where they claim they are the source of top restaurants around the country? Assuming it's not a load of BS, I figure you could get a bunch of their shit delivered and then quit.

I've received Omaha Steaks before as gifts and they were pretty good, but they are damn expensive. I'm talking $25/lb+ for ribeye or $30/lb+ for filet mignon expensive. Those prices are also before shipping charges. I'm not willing to pay restaurant prices for mail order steak.

CrazyKell 03-25-2010 01:31 PM

Find an organic butcher or farm around you.

Around here I've found two farms that offer grass fed meat and all sorts of organic goodness. They have a shop right at the farm. It's pricier but well worth it.

AquaPython 03-25-2010 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shmike (Post 353313)
101 said that those ingredients are free from HFCS and he was right.

The corn vs grass feed argument is another debate all together.

Most animals that are fed a corn based diet are also pumped full of steroids, antibiotics, hormones, etc.

By buying organic meat that does not contain pharmaceuticals you stand a better chance of avoiding those that were raised on a corn diet.

My name is Shmike.

I always post in short, single-sentence paragraphs.

they are separated by a single line.

Often times i will say person X is right and person Y is wrong.

AquaPython 03-25-2010 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shmike (Post 353313)

By buying organic meat that does not contain pharmaceuticals you stand a better chance of avoiding those that were raised on a corn diet.

In all seriousness,
organic does not mean animals not fed on corn. at all.

shmike 03-25-2010 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AquaPython (Post 353350)
In all seriousness,
organic does not mean animals not fed on corn. at all.

In all seriousness, I know.

Did you read the whole post or just the one sentence?

Sometimes I use two or more sentences in a paragraph. See?

Not often though.

Homeslice 03-25-2010 02:23 PM

:lol:

AquaPython 03-25-2010 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shmike (Post 353357)
In all seriousness, I know.

Did you read the whole post or just the one sentence?

Sometimes I use two or more sentences in a paragraph. See?

Not often though.

Fo'Real though.

I have been meaning to call you out on that for months.

It definitely adds a nice dramatic effect.

Sorta along the lines of "speak softly and carry a big stick"...

smileyman 03-25-2010 02:48 PM

3 words. Free Range Chicken.

Really HFCS is a derivative of corn. How did corn itself become the topic? How is it so damn evil?

Anyways, the way beef and chicken are grown here in the US is terrible. Otsa chemical engineering going on there. My ex father in law grew for Pilgrims Pride and man, that isnt right. Nothing is anygood mass produced and genetically engineered...

sherri_chickie 03-25-2010 05:27 PM

Grass fed just tastes better, that's the biggest issue with that. Has nothing to do with corn syrup.

I am excited. Mom is getting a bunch of chickens and we are going in with her. They will be free range and chemical free. Add this to the beef we get from them and the veggies they grown and we are practically organic! Wish I had my own acreage to have a garden..

CrazyKell 03-25-2010 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sherri_chickie (Post 353440)
Grass fed just tastes better, that's the biggest issue with that. Has nothing to do with corn syrup.

I am excited. Mom is getting a bunch of chickens and we are going in with her. They will be free range and chemical free. Add this to the beef we get from them and the veggies they grown and we are practically organic! Wish I had my own acreage to have a garden..


Every thought of joining a food co-op?

sherri_chickie 03-25-2010 10:03 PM

Kell.. wouldn't know where to find one here in Cow-town. I will just pilfer from mom and dad. Their garden is HUGE.

101lifts2 03-25-2010 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AquaPython (Post 353223)
Umm NO.

you wish it was that simple . foods that are only "sugary shit". time to wake up.

if you have never left the country, chances are you have NEVER eaten beef that was not raised SOLELY on, you guessed it..... C O R N.

most chicken, easily accessible, fed C O R N

even though this story in the OP is about HFCS - the REAL story is a bit larger. corn is used for EVERYTHING. HFCS is the widest used, nastiest culprit.

take a look at this and tell me if these ingredients look at all familiar to you:

http://www.cornallergens.com/list/co...table-list.php


WTF are you saying? I listed foods that do not have HFCS and somehow you are saying corn is in everything or used for everything or something like that. I guess. No shit animals eat corn, but it doesn't mean there is HFCS or corn in ur beef. lol

Adeptus_Minor 03-26-2010 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AquaPython (Post 353350)
In all seriousness,
organic does not mean animals not fed on corn. at all.


Of course not.
Organic just means there's carbon in them. :lol:

101lifts2 03-26-2010 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaneman (Post 353268)
:lol: Aquapython already covered this, so yea.

101, dude, I thought you were supposed to be some sort of nutrition expert...you mean to tell me you didn't already know this stuff?

The boy is not making sense...at least not about HFCS.

101lifts2 03-26-2010 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AquaPython (Post 353309)
what kind of beef do you think restaurants use? corn fed beef.

Are you trying to draw a conclusion that there is corn in ur beef?:lol God maybe I'm missing it.

You have to worry about the steriods and antibiotics that are given to the animals, not necessarily what they eat unless the food is loaded with pesticides.

And this whole thread was about how HFCS was getting people fat. It really isn't. Its the enriched flour products and starches combined with no or little exercise. Pastas, tortilla and bread. Garbage IMO.

Homeslice 03-26-2010 02:15 AM

Pound for pound, bread is better than HFCS. Especially if it's good bread like stone-ground or pumpernickel (not cheap shit like Wonder)

AquaPython 03-26-2010 09:19 AM

Try to stay with me, I expanded the topic of conversation to corn in general, and how it is super saturated every corner of the food industry, not just HFCS. Sometimes conversations deviate a little bit. I thought that was pretty clear, but maybe not.

101lifts2 03-26-2010 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AquaPython (Post 353620)
Try to stay with me, I expanded the topic of conversation to corn in general, and how it is super saturated every corner of the food industry, not just HFCS. Sometimes conversations deviate a little bit. I thought that was pretty clear, but maybe not.

But there is nothing wrong with corn.....it is the same as saying that water is in every corner of the food industry. Does this make water bad? But now add chemicals to make Anti-freeze and add it to your food, then it would be bad. But it doesn't at all make water bad. Get the drift?

CrazyKell 03-26-2010 11:23 AM

We get it. The problem with corn, as it were, is that it's so tied up in government and it's being used instead of many other sources. It's like our dependance on oil. It's not great. :idk:

Kaneman 03-26-2010 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 101lifts2 (Post 353677)
But there is nothing wrong with corn.....it is the same as saying that water is in every corner of the food industry. Does this make water bad? But now add chemicals to make Anti-freeze and add it to your food, then it would be bad. But it doesn't at all make water bad. Get the drift?

Actually the corn being put out today has a horrible fatty acid profile and is nothing compared to "back in the day" :lol: corn.

Particle Man 03-26-2010 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 101lifts2 (Post 353677)
But there is nothing wrong with corn.....it is the same as saying that water is in every corner of the food industry. Does this make water bad? But now add chemicals to make Anti-freeze and add it to your food, then it would be bad. But it doesn't at all make water bad. Get the drift?

we haven't genetically altered water at all (I'm sure if the food industry would if they could)...

shmike 03-26-2010 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 101lifts2 (Post 353677)
But there is nothing wrong with corn.....it is the same as saying that water is in every corner of the food industry. Does this make water bad? But now add chemicals to make Anti-freeze and add it to your food, then it would be bad. But it doesn't at all make water bad. Get the drift?

Cows aren't meant to eat corn like they are meant to eat grass.

They don't digest it as well and it can lead to health issues, even death. To compensate, those cattle are often pumped full of steriods, antibiotics, etc.

AquaPython 03-26-2010 12:33 PM

Technically, Corn is a grass.

This is why cows can survive on it, for some time.

It's also why it can grow in very tight proximity to other stalks, hence, more profit / sq foot.

When they are put on the corn feed, it produces so much acid that it will literally melt a whole in the side of a cow, where on could reach in and remove stomach contents.

Homeslice 03-26-2010 12:38 PM

I'm sure grass provides also provides some beneficial chlorophyll or whatever.

AquaPython 03-26-2010 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homeslice (Post 353745)
I'm sure grass provides also provides some beneficial chlorophyll or whatever.

you sure about that, slugger?

Homeslice 03-26-2010 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AquaPython (Post 353746)
you sure about that, slugger?

well it's green, right?

AquaPython 03-26-2010 01:56 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiCRwMMh9k8

101lifts2 03-26-2010 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyKell (Post 353680)
We get it. The problem with corn, as it were, is that it's so tied up in government and it's being used instead of many other sources. It's like our dependance on oil. It's not great. :idk:

There is still nothing wrong with corn, though. Just because the government has their dirty hands all over it, doesn't make it bad. If you eliminated corn, they would just find something else in substitution.

If we wish to debate that corn cannot be processed well by the body OR if there are alot of chemicals added to corn, then those are other topics of discussion. Corn in itself is not what is making America fat.

101lifts2 03-26-2010 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaneman (Post 353683)
Actually the corn being put out today has a horrible fatty acid profile and is nothing compared to "back in the day" :lol: corn.

Funny man u are...but no smoke for U!:lol

TYEster 03-26-2010 09:52 PM

This thread is my idea of comedy...

Avatard 03-26-2010 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 101lifts2 (Post 353965)
There is still nothing wrong with corn, though. Just because the government has their dirty hands all over it, doesn't make it bad. If you eliminated corn, they would just find something else in substitution.

If we wish to debate that corn cannot be processed well by the body OR if there are alot of chemicals added to corn, then those are other topics of discussion. Corn in itself is not what is making America fat.

Corn makes you fat. What part of that escapes you?

101lifts2 03-27-2010 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 353973)
Corn makes you fat. What part of that escapes you?

Corn has the same GI as brown rice...79. This means that insulin reponse is pretty low. Enriched white flour products is much higher and much more carbohydrate dense.

goof2 03-27-2010 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 353973)
Corn makes you fat. What part of that escapes you?

Corn does not make you fat. High fructose corn syrup does. They are not the same.

Kaneman 03-27-2010 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 101lifts2 (Post 353968)
Funny man u are...but no smoke for U!:lol

Where's the joke?

Avatard 03-27-2010 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goof2 (Post 354051)
Corn does not make you fat. High fructose corn syrup does. They are not the same.

Ah, OK, so that's what they must feed to livestock.

My bad.

udman 03-27-2010 12:18 PM

Okay everyone I feel the need to step in here.

Eat, drink and smoke what you want in moderation. Try to get as much variety in your foods as possible and buy fresh when possible.

If you don't slip on the ole' banana peel you will probably live to at least 72 with with a grandchild and a spouse that is sick of your shit.

Captain Morgan 03-27-2010 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 101lifts2 (Post 353568)
And this whole thread was about how HFCS was getting people fat. It really isn't. Its the enriched flour products and starches combined with no or little exercise. Pastas, tortilla and bread. Garbage IMO.

Um, yeah, HFCS is making people fat. Didn't you read the article? You say bread is bad (combined with no exercise), but what about whole wheat breads? And a lot of what is making people fat is the little to no exercise, combined with completely shitty eating habits (i.e. no breakfast, big lunch, big dinner and simply crap food like junk food and fast food).

Kaneman 03-27-2010 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 101lifts2 (Post 353968)
Funny man u are...but no smoke for U!:lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by udman (Post 354079)
Okay everyone I feel the need to step in here.

Eat, drink and smoke what you want in moderation. Try to get as much variety in your foods as possible and buy fresh when possible.

If you don't slip on the ole' banana peel you will probably live to at least 72 with with a grandchild and a spouse that is sick of your shit.

Wow, 72 huh, amazing! :lol:

No thanks dude, I'm tryin' to make it to 100. 72 is still pretty young to die off.

Avatard 03-27-2010 03:25 PM

My dad is in his late 70's, and has a GF in her 20s, and a 5 year old kid.

For real.

101lifts2 03-27-2010 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Morgan (Post 354084)
Um, yeah, HFCS is making people fat. Didn't you read the article? You say bread is bad (combined with no exercise), but what about whole wheat breads? And a lot of what is making people fat is the little to no exercise, combined with completely shitty eating habits (i.e. no breakfast, big lunch, big dinner and simply crap food like junk food and fast food).

I'm not disagreeing that sugary foods, sugary sauces and stuff made from HFCS isn't good for fat loss. However, you are forgetting the caloric density of bread and pastas, which make up a large amount of America's diet, is much much higher than something that has HFCS in it.

I hear people all the time (fat people) cut out "sugary foods" and they loose 5 or 10 lbs and wonder wtf. I tell them to cut out breads and pasta or limit them and usually they will loose much less.

Adeptus_Minor 03-27-2010 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 101lifts2 (Post 354117)
I'm not disagreeing that sugary foods, sugary sauces and stuff made from HFCS isn't good for fat loss. However, you are forgetting the caloric density of bread and pastas, which make up a large amount of America's diet, is much much higher than something that has HFCS in it.

This is why the French, Italians, and other bread and pasta favoring cultures are so disgustingly fat.

Oh wait... :rolleyes:

And if those cows that are getting fat because of corn had a decent activity level and weren't being stuffed to the gills with it, I imagine the outcome would be different. Not unlike the average American, actually.

Captain Morgan 03-27-2010 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 101lifts2 (Post 354117)
I'm not disagreeing that sugary foods, sugary sauces and stuff made from HFCS isn't good for fat loss. However, you are forgetting the caloric density of bread and pastas, which make up a large amount of America's diet, is much much higher than something that has HFCS in it.

I hear people all the time (fat people) cut out "sugary foods" and they loose 5 or 10 lbs and wonder wtf. I tell them to cut out breads and pasta or limit them and usually they will loose much less.

Are you advising them to cut out all carbs? If so, for what length of time? Cutting all carbs for a short while is fine if you want to lose weight fast, but losing weight fast isn't exactly ideal for the body. I think a healthy mix of carbs, fats, and protein is the key, in small meals throughout the day in order to keep the metabolism higher. Combine this with exercise and you have a healthy lifestyle. I'm not a fan of any diet that eliminates something completely.

BobTheBiker 03-27-2010 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Morgan (Post 354163)
Are you advising them to cut out all carbs? If so, for what length of time? Cutting all carbs for a short while is fine if you want to lose weight fast, but losing weight fast isn't exactly ideal for the body. I think a healthy mix of carbs, fats, and protein is the key, in small meals throughout the day in order to keep the metabolism higher. Combine this with exercise and you have a healthy lifestyle. I'm not a fan of any diet that eliminates something completely.

this is probably one of the better ways to do things. its pretty much my method, and I seem to maintain the same weight all the time.

Homeslice 03-27-2010 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 354110)
My dad is in his late 70's, and has a GF in her 20s, and a 5 year old kid.

For real.

A little golddigging going on, perhaps?

Avatard 03-28-2010 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homeslice (Post 354178)
A little golddigging going on, perhaps?

I think she wanted a ticket into show bidness.

She didn't get it.

:lmao:

101lifts2 03-28-2010 03:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adeptus_Minor (Post 354156)
This is why the French, Italians, and other bread and pasta favoring cultures are so disgustingly fat.

Oh wait... :rolleyes:

And if those cows that are getting fat because of corn had a decent activity level and weren't being stuffed to the gills with it, I imagine the outcome would be different. Not unlike the average American, actually.

Most European pastas and breads do not contain Enriched flour, which is not easily digestable. And..they do not eat the amounts we do. Probably 1/3 that being much more active.

101lifts2 03-28-2010 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Morgan (Post 354163)
Are you advising them to cut out all carbs? If so, for what length of time? Cutting all carbs for a short while is fine if you want to lose weight fast, but losing weight fast isn't exactly ideal for the body. I think a healthy mix of carbs, fats, and protein is the key, in small meals throughout the day in order to keep the metabolism higher. Combine this with exercise and you have a healthy lifestyle. I'm not a fan of any diet that eliminates something completely.

You cannot cut out all carbs...its really not possible, but moreso carbs are needed for thyroid production.

The problem is America biases it's caloric intake primarily towards carbs (50%) which has the effect of continous insulin spiking leading to fat gain and eventually type 2 diabetes.

My opinion on carbs is this...they should be used for energy expenditures only. Me personally use carbs as my first meal, during lifting and then after lifting. In the morning your insulin level is low, carbs may rise it, but not enough to gain fat. During and after lifting is simply to replenish lost gylcogen levels so your body doesn't burn muscle. Fat intake is almost shunted at that point.

Particle Man 03-28-2010 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 354200)
I think she wanted a ticket into show bidness.

She didn't get it.

:lmao:

:lol

goof2 03-28-2010 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 354065)
Ah, OK, so that's what they must feed to livestock.

My bad.

Sorry, corn is more fattening than grass, the traditional diet of cows. If the typical human diet was primarily grass, corn on its own would be fattening for us too.

Avatard 03-28-2010 05:20 PM

It's also more fattening than meat, and green vegetables, which I believe was the fucking point.

Corn makes you fucking fat. I didn't think it was hard to understand.

They feed it to livestock to fucking fatten them.

HFCS is fattening too, I believe I read it somewhere...

Apoc 03-28-2010 06:33 PM

Wow, theres a lot of wrong opinions in this thread, and not much right.

Good work guys. Now im going to have to spend an hour of my time later to make you all understand how this shit works.

For some reason I didnt read this thread till now, too much fail to deal with all at once. :lol:

Homeslice 03-28-2010 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 354273)
It's also more fattening than meat, and green vegetables, which I believe was the fucking point.

Corn makes you fucking fat. I didn't think it was hard to understand.

They feed it to livestock to fucking fatten them.

HFCS is fattening too, I believe I read it somewhere...

Corn might make cows fat, but that's not surprising since they sit around confined all day. Is it more fattening than grass, no shit, almost anything would be more fattening than grass. But that says nothing about humans, especially active ones who have no problem burning off carbs. Besides, like 101 said, the carbs in corn aren't that bad, its glycemic index isn't nearly as high as shit like Wonder bread.

It is the hormones and other shit that should concern you more.

Captain Morgan 03-28-2010 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Apoc (Post 354287)
Wow, theres a lot of wrong opinions in this thread, and not much right.

Good work guys. Now im going to have to spend an hour of my time later to make you all understand how this shit works.

For some reason I didnt read this thread till now, too much fail to deal with all at once. :lol:

Looking forward to hearing it.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.