Thread: ninja 250
View Single Post
Old 04-17-2010, 10:38 PM   #22
Full Throttle
~Italian Stallion~
 
Full Throttle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North West Georgia
Moto: 2000 Yamaha YZF-R6
Posts: 446
Default

Ive ridden the older ninja and the new ninja and i still would rather have my Hyosung. I know most people on here may not like the Hyo but the damn bike has a 110mm front tire(mine is a 120mm) and 150mm rear tire. Thats almost as big as 600cc bike tires. The damn thing has a huge footprint for a 250. Here are the specs for the two bikes and by the numbers the Hyo takes the cake. More Horsepower, Larger rear tire, Larger front forks, and Bigger brake rotors. The V-Twin is set at a 75 degree angle to maximize power without having to have 14k+ RPMs(10,500 redline) . Now the Ninja does lead in seat height by 1/2" and it has .25gal larger tank. However the Hyo gets 60-80mpg and the ninja only gets 50-65mpg so the Hyo has a much longer range. Now you look for yourself. Some of the things in the Ninja page need to be converted from metric but ive done some of it for you.

Ninja 250 Hyosung
hp=25 hp=27
TQ=16.7 TQ=16.7
Fuel=4.75gal Fuel=4.5gal


http://kawasaki.com.au/kawpublic_doc...s/ex250j9f.pdf

http://www.hyosungmotorsusa.com/prod...s&model=GT250R
__________________
Full Throttle is offline   Reply With Quote