Go Back   Two Wheel Fix > General > News Desk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-07-2011, 11:12 AM   #81
shmike
Follower
 
shmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Papa_Complex View Post
Perhaps not but they can profit in the sale, of that property, and have received payments towards it. They make money, on virtually every foreclosure. Believe me; both my parents were in banking for their whole lives
I am assuming your parents are retired?

Once upon a time:

Joe & Mary put 20% down. If they made 5 years worth of payments and then defaulted, the bank would take back the home (that was probably worth as much as the sale price, maybe more). Since the bank had 20%+ equity in the acquired home, they would sell it and make money.

That is a very tough scenario to replicate in a down market, let alone a free-falling market. Add in the fact that many houses in the last few years were financed at 95, 100, even 110% of value and there is no profit to be had.
__________________
Racing For Smiles

Last edited by shmike; 06-07-2011 at 11:15 AM..
shmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2011, 11:37 AM   #82
Papa_Complex
Nomadic Tribesman
 
Papa_Complex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brampton, Canada
Moto: '09 ER-6n
Posts: 11,150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shmike View Post
I am assuming your parents are retired?

Once upon a time:

Joe & Mary put 20% down. If they made 5 years worth of payments and then defaulted, the bank would take back the home (that was probably worth as much as the sale price, maybe more). Since the bank had 20%+ equity in the acquired home, they would sell it and make money.

That is a very tough scenario to replicate in a down market, let alone a free-falling market. Add in the fact that many houses in the last few years were financed at 95, 100, even 110% of value and there is no profit to be had.
Retired? Yes and while this is the worst downturn in recent memory, you have to remember that this isn't the first time that housing prices have tanked. Banks made out like robber barons then, and have again. If Freddie Mac and Fannie May had been allowed to fail, then that would be one thing. Because they weren't, this situation isn't fundamentally different from previous ones.
__________________
"Everything's better with pirates." - Lodge, "Dorkness Rising"

http://www.morallyambiguous.net/
Papa_Complex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2011, 03:32 PM   #83
shmike
Follower
 
shmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Papa_Complex View Post
Retired? Yes and while this is the worst downturn in recent memory, you have to remember that this isn't the first time that housing prices have tanked. Banks made out like robber barons then, and have again. If Freddie Mac and Fannie May had been allowed to fail, then that would be one thing. Because they weren't, this situation isn't fundamentally different from previous ones.
This is the first time since the Great Depression that housing prices have TANKED.

There have been dips before but nothing of this magnitude. Not even close. (I have charts if you'd like)

The article you posted earlier said that Fannie and Freddie back about 1/2 of the loans out there. Are we not going to count the other half?
__________________
Racing For Smiles
shmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2011, 03:39 PM   #84
Captain Morgan
Let's do another U-turn
 
Captain Morgan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indiana
Moto: 2009 V-Strom
Posts: 3,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Papa_Complex View Post
Retired? Yes and while this is the worst downturn in recent memory, you have to remember that this isn't the first time that housing prices have tanked. Banks made out like robber barons then, and have again. If Freddie Mac and Fannie May had been allowed to fail, then that would be one thing. Because they weren't, this situation isn't fundamentally different from previous ones.
But it IS different in the fact that homes used to only be financed with 20% down. It wasn't very common for homes to be completely financed, or even over-financed like it is today, which is why banks made out like robber barons back then.
Captain Morgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2011, 03:56 PM   #85
Homeslice
Elitist
 
Homeslice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
Default

Which puts more discredit on the idea that this was some master plan, because if the banks suspected that the market could tank, they'd have required bigger downpayments.
Homeslice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2011, 04:09 PM   #86
shmike
Follower
 
shmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Homeslice View Post
Which puts more discredit on the idea that this was some master plan, because if the banks suspected that the market could tank, they'd have required bigger downpayments.
I agree.

The banks rode the wave up just like everyone else.

They then wised up earlier than the general population and started shorting their own products and that's where things get really messy.
__________________
Racing For Smiles
shmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2011, 04:13 PM   #87
Particle Man
Custom User Title
 
Particle Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central NY
Moto: 2003 SV650S
Posts: 14,959
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Morgan View Post
But it IS different in the fact that homes used to only be financed with 20% down. It wasn't very common for homes to be completely financed, or even over-financed like it is today, which is why banks made out like robber barons back then.
See that totally floored me. I wouldn't have even imagined TRYING to buy a house without at least 20% down (preferably more)
__________________
I'm not "fat."
I'm "Enlarged to show texture."


Handle every stressful situation like a DOG: If you can't eat it or hump it, pi$$ on it & walk away.
Particle Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2011, 04:17 PM   #88
tommymac
Moto GP Star
 
tommymac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 11,022
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle Man View Post
See that totally floored me. I wouldn't have even imagined TRYING to buy a house without at least 20% down (preferably more)
Same here, but my thoughts were on not paying PMI, was like throwing money away IMO
tommymac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2011, 04:19 PM   #89
Particle Man
Custom User Title
 
Particle Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central NY
Moto: 2003 SV650S
Posts: 14,959
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tommymac View Post
Same here, but my thoughts were on not paying PMI, was like throwing money away IMO
Exactly - it wasn't from any sense of fiscal responsibility - I'm just a cheap bastard
__________________
I'm not "fat."
I'm "Enlarged to show texture."


Handle every stressful situation like a DOG: If you can't eat it or hump it, pi$$ on it & walk away.
Particle Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2011, 04:21 PM   #90
tommymac
Moto GP Star
 
tommymac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 11,022
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle Man View Post
Exactly - it wasn't from any sense of fiscal responsibility - I'm just a cheap bastard
I fit that description too. its funny I thought we skirted the bottom when we bough tour house. Now values are still dropping and the mortgage rates are a quarter percent lower too.
tommymac is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.