![]() |
Those were all interesting reads. Thanks for them. I agree that I'm not sure I'm convinced that hybrids are really worse than normal gas vehicles. They may nto be the end-all solution but they are definitely a step in the right direction IMO. That last article talked about how the clever marketing of hybrids is holding back the development of other alternatively fueled vehicles. Before reading that article I was thinking that I was giong to respond saying that soon enough the technology will be improved and concepts like the hydrogen fuel cell honda fcx will be the next step. But after reading that article, people shuold definitely do more research before running out to be a hybrid. I've had my eye on the fcx for a while but it hans;t been released to the masses yet. I've considered holding onto my guzzler attempting to save the money to buy one when they do but am still debating if it'll be more worth it to wait, or get something liek an older civic that gets better mileage than what i have now in the mean time and see where the technology road takes us.
|
to be honest... for me the only reason I'd ever drive a hybrid is for the MPG. but I love my truck... and can deal with the 17-20mpg... and I'll drive it till it dies... then probably rebuild it... and by then... I'll either be dead or we'll be out of fuel. :lol:
if they can come up with a VIABLE 0 emissions vehicle, that doesn't require me spending 80k and has a range equal to that of my tank of gas... THEN I'll think about it... but until then... fuck that. they're obviously not THAT worried themselves or we'd have the technology right now. |
Screw these hybrids...I only drive stick.
|
ahh yes... forgot about that... must be manual transmission too
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I agree with Pauldun.
The Insight looks just like a Prius. |
If you are looking strictly at the economic component, the hybrids are not yielding viable savings over their working lifetime.
Why they aren't producing diesel hybrids is beyond me. THAT might make some economic sense. You'd have to keep the car 10 years to make it pay off. That's about 6-7 years beyond the life expectancy of the batteries. If you were going to keep a car that long, the savings would be in keeping a car that long. What is the cost savings of keeping a car for 10 years instead of 5? What are the PRODUCTION savings of keeping a car for 10 years instead of 5? If someone is serious about being green, don't just buy something that LOOKS green. Think through the entire process of production for cost effectiveness and energy savings. |
Quote:
I wonder... if you take someone who owns a 1975 Chevy pickup (we'll pretend it's running :lol:) with a big gas guzzler motor... and could some how measure the amount of polution and harm done to the enviroment by him... and compare it to someone who's purchased a new vehicle every 4 or 5 years. Accounting for all the emissions of the plants that created the new vehicles... I think the 75 Chevy might be alot greener than one might normally think. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.