![]() |
In ten years, all Infiniti will be automatic CVT hybrids. No exceptions
|
Sorry but I'll never buy a CVT
|
I don't believe it. There is no way the G37 or whatever it will be by then, G39 maybe, go to a CVT or a hybrid for that matter.
|
dumbest move evar!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
how can they make a work truck with a CVT?
FAIL |
I dunno, in theory the CVT is an incredible move towards using a cars full potential. Just imagine having your engine spin at peak power and just changing your transmission drive ratios. Maybe just call me crazy.
However I have no doubt taht car companies would completely screw with it enough to the point that it sucks. |
Quote:
Merge on interstate, tachs up to 6K and still not going anywhere... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
ok you gotta push hybrids cause morons buy the whole heating/cooling/change/whatever it is this week nonsense. but why cant you put a manual in it? iirc honda is the only company to ever release a stick shift hybrid and they dont even sell that one anymore. what fuck
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You will if its the only thing they make. :zowned: |
Quote:
The problem is you cannot apply a large amount of torque because you are not "locking" anything unlike a manual (dry clutch) or automatic (clutch pack). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Actually, there are 2 Jeeps on that chassis. The Compass and the Patriot. Both are either front or all wheel drive Compass is the girl vehicle Patriot is the pre-pubesecent boy vehicle. Difference is the Patriot is more squared off (thing mini Liberty) and with the Limited package, you can "shift" it. Not sure how you can shift a CVT, but it makes a diff :idk: And the Patriot can be "trail rated" (ie it has a low range option on the trans) |
So there's FWD Jeeps now? :rolleyes:
Guess it's fitting though, seeing how at least half of these little "trucklet" owners never go off-road. All they want is the "rugged" style to go with their Eddie Bauer safari shirts. |
Quote:
they are junk. 4 cyl CVT trans... yuck. They don't deserve the Jeep logo on the hood. :panic: but the 3.8L in the Wrangler is a joke too, really gutless. About the only respectable jeeps left are the GC and Liberty. |
Quote:
Did you just call the Liberty respectable? Are you feeling OK? That thing is about as respectable as a Power Wheels Barbie Corvette. |
Quote:
That's more than any other new Jeep has. GC has more power, but a "cityfied" 4X4 system Still think they should offer the 3.0 L diesel in the Lib and Wrangler. |
Quote:
A CVT has 2 big ass cones that are facing opposite each other spaced apart about a foot. You simply move a steel belt up and down the cones to change the gear ratios. Yes CVTs make alot of sense in fact they make perfect sense. The only issue is that they cannot take alot of torque because the steel belt slips. I have taken apart a few CVTs on the Saturn ION (back in 2000) and they are very simple, but fragile at the same time. GM ditched the CVTs because when the pressure was lost in the trans, the steel belt would fall apart (the belt is comprised of little retangular pieces held together by 2 steel bands). Audi seems to have this CVT stuff down pat. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
To the original article, Infiniti is making a pretty big mistake by focusing all their efforts on an engine style that has yet to be profitable. I know Honda and Toyota have stated they loose money on their hybrids. Since they still will not say how much I'm guessing it is a lot. GM and Ford can't make money when using conventional motors. I doubt they are making anything on their hybrids. Infiniti is also making a mistake by exclusively using a transmission style that, at least in this thread, people don't like and don't want. Add in the fact that this would raise the cost of Infinitis due to having to develop their own powertrains instead of just using what Nissan already has and I am not entirely sure Infiniti will be around much more than 10 years. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.