Vette FTW?

[goof2]

Originally Posted by Dave

meh last i heard that tacky plastic boat used a centrifugal. Me being wrong doesnt change the fact that the window is unessesarily ugly/tacky/ricey and has no real purpose or place. And slice, no i didnt add the logo. Maybe amarok got to the pic before me

To each their own.

[z06boy]

Originally Posted by Dave

removeable roof cranks?

I "think" my 78 that I bought in the late 80's had that with the T-Tops...can hardly remember. I know that there was a big problem with theft of the T-Tops and Targa roofs so maybe that was their reasoning ? I honestly don't know.

My 72 was a Vert and I never owned one from the 80's.

[z06boy]

Originally Posted by goof2

To each their own.

Now that's better...at least it actually shows something.

[Dave]

Originally Posted by z06boy

Now that's better...at least it actually shows something.

seriously.

[karl_1052]

Originally Posted by Dave

we do however give you a plastic window with a fantastic view of a plastic engine cover. Ghey

yup, Ghey and ricey




The 430 shows about as much as the vette does.

[Dave]

Originally Posted by karl_1052

yup, Ghey and ricey




The 430 shows about as much as the vette does.

on the f car, no. On the vette, yes.

[shmike]

Originally Posted by karl_1052

yup, Ghey and ricey

Did you just post a pic of a Fiero40 as the counter argument to the claim of rice?

[karl_1052]

Originally Posted by shmike

Did you just post a pic of a Fiero40 as the counter argument to the claim of rice?

I never even looked at the pic, just posted the first F40 pic I found.

No wonder his rice is blacked out.

[Homeslice]

Uh, on a Ferrari the view is a lot more substantial than just seeing a square intercooler.

If Chevy really wanted to provide a good view, they would have given it a front-mount IC so that we could actually see the engine.

[Dave]

Originally Posted by shmike

Did you just post a pic of a Fiero40 as the counter argument to the claim of rice?

i knew that looked ''off'' damn tiny phone screen