![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
Awww come on Dave,you're WAY smarter than that! You know that they'll have all kinds of controls,kinda like an electric forklift. Although,I also think that it is fugly! I agree that I don't want it to necessarily look like every other bike but yeesh. BTW why not just modify an existing chassis?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Chaotic Neutral
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cherry Hill NJ
Moto: GV1200 Madura, Hawk gt
Posts: 13,992
|
Quote:
one thing they wont get past though is the range/weight issue and the fact that you are just displacing the cost of creating that energy (id rather just do it myself thanks)
__________________
TWF Post whore #6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
DefenderOfTheBuelliverse
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Parts Unknown
Moto: Buell XB12R
Posts: 18,585
|
Insanely ugly.
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
Quote:
I noticed that they don't discuss weight...although they claim range is 150 which is about the same as your bike... hey,I'm not married to the I.C.E.,I don't care if they start using little nuclear reactors to power bikes as long as the cost and performance is the same or better,it's all good for me! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|