Canadian courts= teh retarded

[Tmall]

So trying to ground her and having the courts say no means he failed as a parent?

Talk about seeing what you want to see..

[Particle Man]

Originally Posted by Tmall

So trying to ground her and having the courts say no means he failed as a parent?

Talk about seeing what you want to see..

IMO it means the courts failed at letting the parent BE a parent...

Pussification of the WORLD FTL

[Papa_Complex]

Originally Posted by Particle Man

IMO it means the courts failed at letting the parent BE a parent...

Pussification of the WORLD FTL

Right in one.

[Antwanny]

Originally Posted by Tmall

So trying to ground her and having the courts say no means he failed as a parent?

Talk about seeing what you want to see..

to let your kid get the chance to sue you at that age means you fail

[Homeslice]

Originally Posted by Antwanny

to let your kid get the chance to sue you at that age means you fail

Pretty much.

I think most people are focused on themselves these days, and haven't put much thought into the right ways to raise children.

[Tmall]

Originally Posted by Homeslice

Pretty much.

I think most people are focused on themselves these days, and haven't put much thought into the right ways to raise children.

You mean perhaps like taking away priviledges for bad behaviour?

[Homeslice]

Originally Posted by Tmall

You mean perhaps like taking away priviledges for bad behaviour?

I wasn't objecting to that, I'm saying if they had a successful, "normal" parent-child relationship, the kid would never even think of suing his parents. That's just fucking stupid IMO.