Got some insider info...yet to prove it myself.

racedoll · 05-18-2009, 10:03 PM

Ah yes. I forgot about the calibration of them factoring into the numbers. Even still that seems low.

DLIT · 05-18-2009, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by racedoll

Ah yes. I forgot about the calibration of them factoring into the numbers. Even still that seems low.

That's what I'm chocking it up to, dynos being different. The powerband still pulls like mad!

marko138 · 05-19-2009, 09:12 AM

Makes sense. Everything I've read says the 09's are down on power from last year.

Rider · 05-19-2009, 09:23 AM

Make sure you check the a/f ratio. You might have more top end but you could have a flat spot somewhere in the power band. Watch your torque curve as well. It may be a little more peaky than the stock setup.

Mikey · 05-19-2009, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by racedoll

Ah yes. I forgot about the calibration of them factoring into the numbers. Even still that seems low.

Yeah, it does. My '04 636 made 112 at the wheel on a Dynojet. That's a pretty serious fluxuation.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05-18-2009, 10:03 PM	#1
racedoll AMA Supersport Join Date: Nov 2008 Moto: '04 Kawasaki ZX6RR Posts: 3,392	Ah yes. I forgot about the calibration of them factoring into the numbers. Even still that seems low.

05-19-2009, 09:23 AM	#4
Rider Moto GP Star Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 12,156	Make sure you check the a/f ratio. You might have more top end but you could have a flat spot somewhere in the power band. Watch your torque curve as well. It may be a little more peaky than the stock setup.