![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
sergeant hatred
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ottawa
Moto: The bus
Posts: 2,723
|
Quote:
Triumph 675 makes 35lbs/ft of troque at 3000rpm(47.0lbs/ft at 10400rpm) Fact.
__________________
My wife was afraid of the dark...then she saw me naked and now she's afraid of the light. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Follower
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,549
|
Quote:
![]() It is a bigger motor with HUGE pistons compared the the 675, of course it has more torque. The torque curve of the 675 is very linear and builds steadily like most inlines. The Buell curve is funny. It is close to peak at around 2700, then falls on it's face and doesn't get back into the 70's until around 5500. FACT. With the Buell, you're best served to keep it between 2000-2700 or between 5500-6750. Either way it is a narrow window. OPINION.
__________________
Racing For Smiles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Aspiring Rapper
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Halifax, NS
Moto: '12 CB1000R
Posts: 3,569
|
Quote:
There are NO flat spots when you're riding it, and it pulls hard from 2500-7100 in every gear. FACT The window is far from narrow, as the bike revs slower than a short stroke 4. The only problem I have with the power band is that it doesn't drop anywhere, so I find myself hitting the limiter from time to time, since it just pulls hard all the way to it.. FACT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
Burger King shits all over Micky D's
FACT ok maybe opinion
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
Neither Ronald McDonald nor the Burger King are fit to lick Checkers BALL SACK!!! For drive thru type food, Checkers is the bomb!!! I had their Baconzilla burger the other day and almost nutted it was so good! Don't get me started on their wings and french fries...
Oh and their shakes... ohhhhhhh... see ya!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
Man that was good! A short ride and some Checkers food!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Follower
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,549
|
Quote:
I agree that it doesn't taper off at the end. Very easy to hit the limiter if you aren't paying attention.
__________________
Racing For Smiles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,156
|
That's true of any low reving V-Twin when you are used to power band characteristics of a I-4. I rode a Super Duke and it hit red line in a blink of an eye. I was consistently hitting the rev limiter in every gear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Aspiring Rapper
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Halifax, NS
Moto: '12 CB1000R
Posts: 3,569
|
Quote:
Now that I have the way too loud pipe on it, no more "stutter" when the valve shifts. Depending on the bike, the cable could have been loose for the valve, or the muffler could have been dented in a spot that would have compromised the smoothness of the valve movement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Follower
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,549
|
I'm talking about the torque curve of the XB motor.
Here is Sportrider's dyno of the '04 XB12R. Unless their bike's exhaust was dented in the same place as the Buell I had, I'll assume it was across all the motors of that year. There is a noticeable lull. Maybe it's been corrected on the newer models, it pretty much went away with the new exhaust.
__________________
Racing For Smiles |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| ugly frame & swingarm |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|