![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Aspiring Rapper
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Halifax, NS
Moto: '12 CB1000R
Posts: 3,569
|
Quote:
Now that I have the way too loud pipe on it, no more "stutter" when the valve shifts. Depending on the bike, the cable could have been loose for the valve, or the muffler could have been dented in a spot that would have compromised the smoothness of the valve movement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Follower
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,549
|
I'm talking about the torque curve of the XB motor.
Here is Sportrider's dyno of the '04 XB12R. Unless their bike's exhaust was dented in the same place as the Buell I had, I'll assume it was across all the motors of that year. There is a noticeable lull. Maybe it's been corrected on the newer models, it pretty much went away with the new exhaust.
__________________
Racing For Smiles |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
White Trash Hero
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
Moto: Buell 1125R Porco Rosso Edition
Posts: 4,895
|
Quote:
Those torque numbers for the 675 seem VERY low. I have seen them dyno at or above most 600s at 58 ft lbs...
__________________
![]() Arkriders.com To be the best you must first be willing to risk the worst! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Aspiring Rapper
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Halifax, NS
Moto: '12 CB1000R
Posts: 3,569
|
Quote:
The thunderstorm makes 84ft/lb to the 82 or so of the 1125. Both being crank numbers. The difference being, the xb makes it at 6000. The 1125 at 9000. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| ugly frame & swingarm |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|