|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
08-18-2009, 03:37 PM
|
#1 | |
|
Serious Business
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Moto: 1993 ZX-11 2008 CBR1000rr
Posts: 9,723
|
Mustang GT for under 13K brand spanking new!!!
In 1988 that is..
If you ever wanted to see how much it weighed and cost way back when http://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,1607,7...0109--,00.html
__________________
 Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
08-18-2009, 03:42 PM
|
#2 |
|
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,156
|
Those number are for striped down base models. The sticker on my car was over 6K more than what they have listed.
Edit.. Never mind I just saw the "Base Price" in parentheses. |
|
|
|
|
08-18-2009, 03:55 PM
|
#3 |
|
White Trash Hero
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
Moto: Buell 1125R Porco Rosso Edition
Posts: 4,895
|
What was its hp rating? 255 or something? I think the Iroc was at 275. Dark days they were...
__________________
 Arkriders.com To be the best you must first be willing to risk the worst! |
|
|
|
|
08-18-2009, 04:06 PM
|
#4 | ||
|
Serious Business
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Moto: 1993 ZX-11 2008 CBR1000rr
Posts: 9,723
|
Quote:
225Hp....grab it in 5.0LX and 5spd and you had a sweet ride. 225hp and 300lb torque in a sub 3000lb car was a lot of fun.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
08-18-2009, 04:13 PM
|
#5 |
|
White Trash Hero
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
Moto: Buell 1125R Porco Rosso Edition
Posts: 4,895
|
I had a 83 Z28 HO with a 5 spd and T-tops. Yes it was fun. Not fast as what I have experienced since but entertaining...
__________________
Arkriders.com To be the best you must first be willing to risk the worst! |
|
|
|
|
08-18-2009, 04:22 PM
|
#6 | |
|
Serious Business
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Moto: 1993 ZX-11 2008 CBR1000rr
Posts: 9,723
|
Reminds me of all the praise heaped on old muscle cars.
Once you actually drive a stock one....not so great compared to whats available now but back when they hit the scene they were a blast compared to what was available. Progress will do that.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-18-2009, 04:23 PM
|
#7 | |
|
AMA Supersport
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,756
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-18-2009, 04:32 PM
|
#8 | ||
|
Serious Business
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Moto: 1993 ZX-11 2008 CBR1000rr
Posts: 9,723
|
Quote:
The 88 had a couple of V8's available that year. 5.0 available in 170HP, 220HP (or 195 with auto) and the 5.7 with 230 (automatic only) It weighed a couple hundred pounds more than the Mustang.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
08-18-2009, 05:01 PM
|
#9 |
|
White Trash Hero
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
Moto: Buell 1125R Porco Rosso Edition
Posts: 4,895
|
Well you can argue 'claimed hp', maufacturer claims, and dyno numbers all day but it matters not. Mine wasnt stock as I am certain most ended up modded and the butt dyno says
NOT FAST. fun yes but not adrenaline rushing, eyeball bugging fast, at least not beside my 454 swbPU...
__________________
Arkriders.com To be the best you must first be willing to risk the worst! |
|
|
|
|
08-19-2009, 09:54 PM
|
#10 |
|
Imported from Detroit
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Michigan
Moto: 2001 Suzuki TL1000R
Posts: 989
|
I love my '85 GT...210hp 302 and a 5 speed. She gets some new goodies this weekend and its time to rack up some mileage...and burn down a set of tires.
__________________
 Cry Havok! And let slip the hogs of war! |
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
