![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
WSB Champion
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Anaheim, CA
Moto: 2009 Kawi ZX6R
Posts: 5,570
|
I'm not sure if overall the bike saves money, but the time saving is priceless. My commuter bike was 3k total and everything maintenance wse was replaced before I bought it. I pay 90 bucks a YEAR for liabilty insurance and the bike gets 50mpg each fillup doing 85-100 mph. My F-150 got 14.66 on the last 65 buck fillup. Uggg....the bike is usually 13-14 bucks after 185 miles.
Since you get to split lanes in CA, I can get to work in 10 minutes (10 miles) in the morning rush hour traffic. Not to mention I get to go to the front of every traffic light and speeding is almost accepted if you're on a bike. If I didn't get to lane split, I would prolly just take the truck.
__________________
Train Hard Ron Paul - 2012 Mark of Excellence GM |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Ride Naked.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Flat and Straight ND
Moto: 08 BUELL 1125R, 05 SV650S
Posts: 7,916
|
Another added cost is the tires. Bike tires cost half (approx) of cage tires (as there are only 2) but most last less than half the life of a car tire as well.
I know damn well I'm not saving money by riding my bike vs driving a fuel efficient car to work everyday. BUT since I am going to have the bike anyway as a recreational toy, I AM saving money riding that vs driving a big pickup .
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|