BCS standings

[Trip]

it's only fair for the SEC to send only one team to the title game. If you lose the SEC title game, you don't deserve to go. Hell look at Georgia two years ago. They didn't even go to the SEC title game and they were bitching about not going to the champ game. Fuck you, you didn't even win your division, you dont deserve to go.

I can still hope for a playoffs even though the faggot big 10 will never let us have it.

[tommymac]

Suppose fla and al aare realy the 2 top teams in the country they prolly should get consideration to play in the title game. I think it almost happened a few yrs ago with one of the big 12 teams.

I think GA should have played USC that year. GA destroyed hawaii and usc spanked illinois, 2 teams that obviously had no business being in a bcs game.

[Trip]

Originally Posted by tommymac

Suppose fla and al aare realy the 2 top teams in the country they prolly should get consideration to play in the title game. I think it almost happened a few yrs ago with one of the big 12 teams.

I think GA should have played USC that year. GA destroyed hawaii and usc spanked illinois, 2 teams that obviously had no business being in a bcs game.

Well think about the first Florida title win 3 years ago, Michigan and Ohio State played and tOSU won. The fuckin Big 10 people were screaming rematch, they are the best teams EVAR!!! Florida plays tOSU and beats them to a fuckin pulp. Big 10 finds out they suck in comparison, LSU carries on with the beating the next year. All is well in SEC land.

I was against the rematch for the Michigan/tOSU game and I am against rematches for SEC teams as well.

I do think every conference needs a title game or no conference should have title games. You are just beating yourselves up for no damn reason in a shitty system. Play more out of conference teams and get two of your best teams in the national championship without playing each other.

[tommymac]

Originally Posted by Trip

Well think about the first Florida title win 3 years ago, Michigan and Ohio State played and tOSU won. The fuckin Big 10 people were screaming rematch, they are the best teams EVAR!!! Florida plays tOSU and beats them to a fuckin pulp. Big 10 finds out they suck in comparison, LSU carries on with the beating the next year. All is well in SEC land.

I was against the rematch for the Michigan/tOSU game and I am against rematches for SEC teams as well.

I do think every conference needs a title game or no conference should have title games. You are just beating yourselves up for no damn reason in a shitty system. Play more out of conference teams and get two of your best teams in the national championship without playing each other.

Good points, sometimes its hard to tell who is realy deserving, but if both fla and ala beat a whole bunch of quality opponents and have a close game in the title game they may get a remach esp if there are no other undefeated teams.

These conference championships also help generate more revenue for the schools/conferences. Thing was a few years ago when the big 8 became the big 12 and the sec took in a few teams you kinda had ot have a playoff. At this time i cant see the big ten or pac 10 going that way.

Tom

[Rider]

I hate the BCS but it's better than awarding the NC to a team that may not be the best. I know the current setup is not a guarantee either but at least you get the #1 and #2 playing each other. You don't get shared titles anymore like UW and UM had in 1991.

[tommymac]

Originally Posted by Rider

I hate the BCS but it's better than awarding the NC to a team that may not be the best. I know the current setup is not a guarantee either but at least you get the #1 and #2 playing each other. You don't get shared titles anymore like UW and UM had in 1991.

Problem is when you get a few teams that may be deserving of a shot. Seem slik eevery year theres one or 2 teams that kinda get screwed.

Tom

[Rider]

Originally Posted by tommymac

Problem is when you get a few teams that may be deserving of a shot. Seem slik eevery year theres one or 2 teams that kinda get screwed.

Tom

Oh I know the system is flawed and I am for a playoff. I just think it's better than the old system.

[Trip]

Originally Posted by Rider

I hate the BCS but it's better than awarding the NC to a team that may not be the best. I know the current setup is not a guarantee either but at least you get the #1 and #2 playing each other. You don't get shared titles anymore like UW and UM had in 1991.

LSU/USC managed to share the AP and BCS titles in 2003.

We need a real NCAA champion of college football. There has never been a recognized NCAA champion of college football. That's just messed up. Pretty much every other major NCAA sport has this...


What I would like to see is the six BCS conferences have conference championship games. If you want in, you have to have a conference title game. The winner from these title games plays in a 8 team playoff. With 2 at large/open spots for crappy conferences or 2 other good teams that didn't win their conference.