Old tires a threat

[Flexin]

Originally Posted by goof2

I didn't like that either. The fact that they gave no statistics demonstrating frequency of accidents due to this issue wasn't encouraging. If these accidents occurred with anywhere near the frequency the report implied you also would think they could have found some real life survivors to sit in front of the camera and recount their horrific ordeal. That they only used one possible case to demonstrate their was a problem while laying no foundation for the event in question (how was the van loaded, what condition were the tires in, how many miles did the tires have) doesn't sit well with me. I believe they stated in the video that the tires were 4 years old when purchased and 9 years old at the time of the accident. For the average American passenger vehicle that would equate to around 75k miles on the tires at the time of the accident.

Maybe old tires are the problem the report makes it out to be, but the shitty reporting calls that contention in to question for me.

Yes they could have given more info, and it would have been nice to see pics of the other tires since they showed pics of the van.

Tires that are 4 years old should fine for a trip.

James

[goof2]

Originally Posted by Flexin

Yes they could have given more info, and it would have been nice to see pics of the other tires since they showed pics of the van.

Tires that are 4 years old should fine for a trip.

James

4 year old tires should be fine, but that is my primary problem with the story. The tires were 4 years old when sold. At the time of the accident they were 9 years old. How many miles did they accrue over the 5 years they were on the van and what condition were they in at the time of the accident? That they never mentioned either in the story leads me to believe that, at best, those two facts didn't support the narrative they were trying to sell.

[101lifts2]

Originally Posted by goof2

4 year old tires should be fine, but that is my primary problem with the story. The tires were 4 years old when sold. At the time of the accident they were 9 years old. How many miles did they accrue over the 5 years they were on the van and what condition were they in at the time of the accident? That they never mentioned either in the story leads me to believe that, at best, those two facts didn't support the narrative they were trying to sell.

Exactly...I'm betting the tires were dry rotted and the tread was worn out.

[Flexin]

Originally Posted by 101lifts2

Exactly...I'm betting the tires were dry rotted and the tread was worn out.

But that is part of the story. In most cases a 4 year old tire isn't going to dry rot IMO. But let it sit for 4 years before installing them on your car.

Did anyone go check the date of their tires because of this story?

James

[Flexin]

Originally Posted by goof2

4 year old tires should be fine, but that is my primary problem with the story. The tires were 4 years old when sold. At the time of the accident they were 9 years old. How many miles did they accrue over the 5 years they were on the van and what condition were they in at the time of the accident? That they never mentioned either in the story leads me to believe that, at best, those two facts didn't support the narrative they were trying to sell.

Yeah I understand the the issue. I believe the story, I think they did a poor job in telling it but I believe it.

I didn't like how they kept talking about how they were selling the tires as new. They are new tires. They are not used. They are new tires. Just think of the garages that had tires for a long time and would also leave them sitting outside all day in the sun.

James