Opinions

karl_1052 · 02-26-2010, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by squidward

No and no.

Don't you mean "NO and NO"?

goof2 · 02-26-2010, 10:42 AM

I don't like either option at all, but I think the factory quad lamps on 70 GMs look "right" (LeMans/GTO, Skylark, Chevelle). As Troy said though, your car your choice.

shmike · 02-26-2010, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goof2

I don't like either option at all, but I think the factory quad lamps on 70 GMs look "right" (LeMans/GTO, Skylark, Chevelle). As Troy said though, your car your choice.

Agreed.

I'm not against resto-mods but I think the front end looks great from the factory.

Not digging the square-lights. Wrong era.

squidward · 02-26-2010, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karl_1052

Don't you mean "NO and NO"?

Yelling is never constructive.

Particle Man · 02-26-2010, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by squidward

Yelling is never constructive.

unless you REALLY mean it.

TommyHotWheel · 02-27-2010, 02:54 AM

No...and no...please no. I have had 2 of these and I was conceived in the back seat of one. I have been searching for another for 7 years. But extending the original grille and using a first gen Camaro RS type hide-away set up might look nice.

Carolina · 03-02-2010, 07:44 PM

i love those cars my dad has a 66 chevy chevelle and two 64 thunderbirds i gonna get a 67 one day all the chevies from 65 to bout 72 were mean looking good luck

wildchild · 03-04-2010, 04:08 PM

those type of mods are better done to some ricer/poser car. no one cares about those things. LOL

it's your car do what you like but since you asked for opinions, I do not like either of those options. old amer muscle cars look good hot rodded a little but not much fab work on the bodies. shaved handles and frenched tails are about as drastic as most "like"

02-27-2010, 02:54 AM	#6
TommyHotWheel Imported from Detroit Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Michigan Moto: 2001 Suzuki TL1000R Posts: 989	No...and no...please no. I have had 2 of these and I was conceived in the back seat of one. I have been searching for another for 7 years. But extending the original grille and using a first gen Camaro RS type hide-away set up might look nice. __________________ Cry Havok! And let slip the hogs of war!

03-02-2010, 07:44 PM	#7
Carolina Says it's time to ride Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: San Diego, CA :) Moto: 2003 honda CBR 954/ 2011 Road King classic Posts: 1,012	i love those cars my dad has a 66 chevy chevelle and two 64 thunderbirds i gonna get a 67 one day all the chevies from 65 to bout 72 were mean looking good luck __________________ a wise man once said if u wipe ur ass with your hand you'll have a fistfull of shit

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

02-26-2010, 10:42 AM	#2
goof2 AMA Supersport Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 4,756	I don't like either option at all, but I think the factory quad lamps on 70 GMs look "right" (LeMans/GTO, Skylark, Chevelle). As Troy said though, your car your choice.

03-04-2010, 04:08 PM	#8
wildchild cruiser Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: on the run Moto: '09 HD superglide, 16 Yamaha FZ 09 Posts: 2,749	those type of mods are better done to some ricer/poser car. no one cares about those things. LOL it's your car do what you like but since you asked for opinions, I do not like either of those options. old amer muscle cars look good hot rodded a little but not much fab work on the bodies. shaved handles and frenched tails are about as drastic as most "like"