![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
DefenderOfTheBuelliverse
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Parts Unknown
Moto: Buell XB12R
Posts: 18,585
|
He didn't say they were posted 15...he said they are 15. Big difference...and he probly knows since he rides them often.
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
el diablo de verde
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Howell, MI
Moto: VTR, CBR, DRZSM
Posts: 1,046
|
Yeah there needs to be more accuracy with the old speed recommendation signs for corners... some will say 30 and you can take them at 60 easily, some say 30 and you will eat shit at 35...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
WERA White Plate
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Renton, WA
Moto: Ninja 650R
Posts: 1,920
|
Quote:
I rode some turns yesterday that were marked 40 and the cagers were doing 35. I was going 70 of course... Concrete kneewall on one side and UPS truck on the other. Bit hairy.There are some nasty ones nearby though, that would be OK if they were flat. The roll/camber and several elevation drops mid turn make them extremely challenging. They're marked 20-30, and I'm lucky to hit 35-40. Very blind turns- even if there were no trees hanging over the road, you couldn't see the lower part of the turn for the drop with the hill in between.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Chopstix / \
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Akron OH
Moto: 03 CBR RR
Posts: 5,350
|
you also have to understand those numbers are for cars, which take up the entire lane, and have a tighter turn than us bikers whom and go from outside-inside-outside and make a generally sharp turn for a car a no brainer on a bike.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|