![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
AMA Supersport
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,698
|
Quote:
James
__________________
"Bust a nut inside your eye, to show you where I come from" "f youre horny, lets do it, Ride it, my pony, My saddles waitin, Come and jump on it, If youre horny, lets do it" "I'm not a playa I just fuck a lot" "Round two, I'm down to Do, what it takes to make you Understand I'm the Candyman And I melt in your mouth, not in your hands Hard as rock, yes I'm no sucka The boots I knock make me one bad mutha" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
SFL Expatriate #2
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Moto: CBR1000
Posts: 2,043
|
Quote:
255/50/19 (less rigid of a ride, and less concern of pothole damage) vs. 315/35/20 (just a LOT of tire for a kid-haulder )The 20's came with much more interesting wheels, but not nice enough to justify the added cost. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
Quote:
What kind of SUV was this, a Porsche Cayenne or something? That's a big step up from 255's. I assume those rims are a couple inches wider than the standard ones? Last edited by Homeslice; 06-28-2011 at 11:45 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
SFL Expatriate #2
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Moto: CBR1000
Posts: 2,043
|
X5, but yeah, the 315's were part of the M sport package. The wheels were much nicer, but not exactly the kind of tire I need on an SUV. Save that stuff for the performance vehicles and let the SUV be just that... with a nicer ride and tires with a better treadwear rating.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|