![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
token jewboy
Join Date: Nov 2008
Moto: CBR 900, KLR ugly ass duckling, Gas Man
Posts: 10,799
|
Quote:
No but a 250 wont slam you head on into a tree at 160 mph, it will do it at 90. And for what its worth, I have always tried to steer folks towards the older 650 twins, they are more than powerful enough to keep someone entertained for a few years, but are still forgiving enough that you can screw up a little and still maintain composure, while at teh same time not screwing up a 10k bike because you flung it off the side of a mountain
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
moderator chick
![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hill Country TX
Moto: Pasta Rockets
Posts: 8,917
|
Quote:
Either speed control will be difficult, maybe more difficult on a 250 with a stock suspension.
__________________
We have enough youth. How about a fountain of "smart"? Come Play at the Track!! http://www.elitetrackdays.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
125GP Champion
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Worthington, OH
Moto: Empty Garage
Posts: 3,419
|
But the small displacement bike will allow you to get away with a sloppy throttle hand when learning. Especially in weather.
I dont necessarily think a 250 is a must. But a parallel twin 500 or 650 is way better learning tool than a 600 ss....
__________________
*Coming soon? 2010 Ducati Monster 696 - Sold 1984 Honda VF500F - Sold 1999 Yamaha R6 - Sold |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|