![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Canyon Carver
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Northern VA
Moto: FJR1300
Posts: 462
|
The 06 SV1k was about .5 sec slower than the 98 TLR in the 1/4 mile(sportrider), which was a little down on HP, FWIW. The SV1K does weigh less though, so that could help with cornering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Custom User Title
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central NY
Moto: 2003 SV650S
Posts: 14,959
|
I wouldn't mind either one parked in my driveway. I've ridden the SV1k and I prefer the 650 but that doesn't mean I wouldn't buy one if the price were right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Custom User Title
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central NY
Moto: 2003 SV650S
Posts: 14,959
|
it looks sorta like the older model TL...
__________________
I'm not "fat." I'm "Enlarged to show texture." Handle every stressful situation like a DOG: If you can't eat it or hump it, pi$$ on it & walk away. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
Those are good looking bikes, but I don't get why anyone would buy something with a sportbike-like riding position and a Ducati pricetag if it only has 75hp. Seems like those people should buy a Monster instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
The Man
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: CrabTown USA
Moto: 00 Bimota DB4
Posts: 823
|
Quote:
And the riding position is more relaxed and comfy than it looks. REALLY!
__________________
http://www.decreasingradius.net/ |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|